From: akolarik@...
Date: 2002-08-22T06:32:10+09:00
Subject: RE: A Repeat: New Language After Ruby?
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C2495A.2FAFF460
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JamesBritt [mailto:james@jamesbritt.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 5:15 PM
> To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
> Subject: RE: A Repeat: New Language After Ruby?
>
...
> For me, the criteria would lean more towards "not like any other
> language I've
> used," or, "Fairly new, so that it was designed to exploit current
> technology and up-to-date CompSci thinking/theory."
>
> Pragmatic versus exotic; use the pragmatic approach in
> day-to-day work, and
> explore exotic tools by night.
>
> James
>
Has anyone here done anything with Rebol? I read something about it
a while ago but haven't heard anything recently.
-- Tony K.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C2495A.2FAFF460
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
RE: A Repeat: New Language After Ruby?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JamesBritt [mailto:james@jamesbritt.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 5:15 PM
> To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
> Subject: RE: A Repeat: New Language After Ruby?
>
...
> For me, the criteria would lean more towards "not like any other
> language I've
> used," or, "Fairly new, so that it was designed to exploit current
> technology and up-to-date CompSci thinking/theory."
>
> Pragmatic versus exotic; use the pragmatic approach in
> day-to-day work, and
> explore exotic tools by night.
>
> James
>
Has anyone here done anything with Rebol? I read something about it
a while ago but haven't heard anything recently.
-- Tony K.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C2495A.2FAFF460--