From: WATANABE Hirofumi <eban@...>
Date: 2002-08-21T11:06:38+09:00
Subject: Re: quines (again)

Hi,

Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@PATH.Berkeley.EDU> writes:

> 
> Bill Kelly wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Sorry if this is annoying, 'cause I know we've done quines before,
> > but I just came up with this one, and was all "stoked and stuff"
> > (to use 80's southern california vernacular ;)
> > 
> > p eval _="print 'p eval _=';_"
> 
> Dude, that's tubular. (Sorry, I'm from CA.)
> 
> Is that the smallest ruby quine that anyone's seen?

% cp /dev/null zero
% ls -l zero
-rw-r--r--    1 watanabe ruby            0 Aug 21 10:55 zero
% cat zero
% ruby zero

-- 
eban