From: Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>
Date: 2002-08-21T10:24:44+09:00
Subject: Re: quines (again)

Bill Kelly wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Sorry if this is annoying, 'cause I know we've done quines before,
> but I just came up with this one, and was all "stoked and stuff"
> (to use 80's southern california vernacular ;)
> 
> p eval _="print 'p eval _=';_"

Dude, that's tubular. (Sorry, I'm from CA.)

Is that the smallest ruby quine that anyone's seen?