From: William Djaja Tjokroaminata <billtj@...>
Date: 2002-08-09T22:04:07+09:00
Subject: Re: Is There an Inverse of 'rb_define_method'?

Hi,

In this case, then, instead of "rb_obj_method" which returns a VALUE, can
we have another function which will return directly the function pointer
itself?  Because we are in the realm of C already, probably it is better
to bypass Ruby VALUE intermediary.  (In my Ruby-C world, the C side does
not need to deal with VALUE unnecessarily; only when interfacing with the
Ruby user the data needs to be converted into VALUE.)

I have tried to dig into the Ruby internal struct's themselves, but they
are very complicated, and without a standard function, this may cause
segmentation fault later...

Regards,

Bill
============================================================================
nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
> Hi,

  VALUE method = rb_obj_method(obj, rb_intern("func_name"));

  rb_method_call(n, argv, method);

> Wmm, they are not defined yet both, just *candidates* for new
> features I imagined.

> -- 
> Nobu Nakada