From: Pirmin Kalberer <pi_ml@...>
Date: 2002-08-06T16:55:39+09:00
Subject: Re: embed or swig?

Am Sonntag, 4. August 2002 01.15 schrieben Sie:
>
> Wait a minute.  Do you really mean that, after you've written your C++
> classes, you just feed nine lines to Swig and after some crunching you
> have them available in Ruby?  Or are you just simplifying?

I saw this thread on the Ruby Weekly News and was surprised, that some Ruby 
programmers don't know SWIG!
So I assume that Kalyptus is even more unknown. It is derived from kdoc, which 
is the KDE pendant to javadoc, Doxygen, etc.
It produces the same code like SWIG, but has no documentation, no homepage and 
should probably have more support from the Ruby community.
URL: http://webcvs.kde.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/kdebindings/kalyptus/

Pirmin

-- 
Pirmin Kalberer
sourcepole  -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
pi@sourcepole.com  http://www.sourcepole.com