From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date: 2002-07-31T00:43:02+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby Language Q's

ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:

> >>>>> "D" == Dave Thomas <Dave@PragmaticProgrammer.com> writes:
> 
> D> I always liked that idea, and was never too sure why it never got
> D> discussed further.
> 
>  You must change the API for extensions

I don't think so. The change I was discussing was that

   pierre(a, :b => 1, :c => 2)

could instead be written

   pierre a b: 1 c: 2

so that the b: and c: would be picked up and converted to a hash as
now. I _think_ it's parsable, and it doesn't change the internals at
all.


Cheers


Dave