From: ts <decoux@...>
Date: 2002-07-23T15:16:08+09:00
Subject: Re: rdtool and rdoc

>>>>> "L" == Lyle Johnson <jlj@cfdrc.com> writes:

L> "ts" <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote in message
L> news:200207221554.g6MFst919982@moulon.inra.fr...
>> >>>>> "D" == Dave Thomas <Dave@PragmaticProgrammer.com> writes:
>> 
D> ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
D> So... A suggestion. I'd like to propose RDoc as the tool used to
D> document Ruby libraries and the Ruby interpreter itself.
>> >>                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[...]

 Like said

L> interpreter, or just against using it to document the interpreter?

 this is the latter



Guy Decoux