From: Jim Freeze <jfreeze@...>
Date: 2002-07-22T20:22:36+09:00
Subject: Re: FXRuby-1.0.11 install make failed

On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 07:30:35PM +0900, Curt Hibbs wrote:
> Jim Freeze wrote:
> >
> The problem is in the Ruby header files. The FXRuby build instructions (I
> believe that is in chapter 2 of the FXRUby users guide) discuss things that
> can go wrong with the FXRuby build and what to do about it. Your problem is
> mentioned their, along with the solution.
> 

Hmmm, maybe you can explain. I did not change the ruby header files
but changed two fxruby files:

FXRuby.h
----From---
id FXRbGcMark(void *obj){
  if(obj){
    VALUE value=FXRbGetRubyObj(obj); // only search FXRuby_ObjMap!
    if(value!=Qnil){
#if RUBY_VERSION_CODE < 172
      rb_gc_mark(reinterpret_cast<void*>(value));
#else
      rb_gc_mark(value);
#endif
      }
    }
  }
----To---
id FXRbGcMark(void *obj){
  if(obj){
    VALUE value=FXRbGetRubyObj(obj); // only search FXRuby_ObjMap!
    if(value!=Qnil){
#if RUBY_VERSION_CODE < 172
      rb_gc_mark(value);
#else
      rb_gc_mark(value);
#endif
      }
    }
  }
-----
I am using 1.6.7. Maybe I should have changed ' < 172' to ' < 167'?

markfuncs.cpp
----From---
#if RUBY_VERSION_CODE < 172
#define MARK(p) rb_gc_mark(reinterpret_cast<void *>((p)))
#else
#define MARK(p) rb_gc_mark(reinterpret_cast<VALUE>((p)))
#endif
----To-----
#if RUBY_VERSION_CODE < 172
#define MARK(p) rb_gc_mark(reinterpret_cast<VALUE>((p)))
#else
#define MARK(p) rb_gc_mark(reinterpret_cast<VALUE>((p)))
#endif
-----------

Again, I could have changed the  test from 172 to 167.

My question is, why are these tests for 172 and not against
167?

Thanks
-- 
Jim Freeze
If only I had something clever to say for my comment...
~