From: Clifford Heath <cjh_nospam@...>
Date: 2002-07-08T10:01:10+09:00
Subject: Re: (0..3) == (0...4) returning false?

Tobias Reif wrote:
> .. or simply Array.new (4..15)

Perhaps, but Array.new(0..2**100) could be a bad idea.
A polymorphic implementation of Array designed to contain
continuous ranges could handle this though. Or should Range
support the array operators?

--
Clifford Heath