From: Michael Campbell Date: 2002-07-07T13:21:18+09:00 Subject: Re: is there a better string.each? --- Sean Russell wrote: > Michael Campbell wrote: > > > I don't think that "ordered set of characters" implies "Array". > > I don't know of a better definition of "Array" than "an ordered set > of > somethings". That's not what I said. While array => ordered set, it's not necessarily true that ordered set => array (which is what I said). Someone else mentioned earlier what's been bugging me about this; although you may like to think of strings as arrays, the array bit is just an implementation choice. The thing is not necessarily its implementation. ===== -- Use your computer to help find a cure for cancer: http://members.ud.com/projects/cancer/ Yahoo IM: michael_s_campbell __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com