From: John Lam <drjflam@...>
Date: 2005-12-15T23:59:33+09:00
Subject: Re: Dynamically adding methods to a Ruby class

------=_Part_7592_19298189.1134658766492
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On 12/15/05, Robert Klemme <bob.news@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> Note that this might have adversary effects on other code if consts sprin=
g
> into existence just like that.
>

I trimmed most of the code out of that example for clarity, but there will
be a bunch of code that will looks up valid types to instantiate and will
punt to an old_method_missing call if the constant name is an invalid type.

Thanks for the constructor block suggestion - I did have a version sometime
last night that used that feature, but I can't recall why I changed it.

Cheers,
-John
http://www.iunknown.com

------=_Part_7592_19298189.1134658766492--