From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2002-06-04T00:09:29+09:00
Subject: Re: Infinity (?!)

Hi,

In message "Re: Infinity (?!)"
    on 02/06/03, Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

|I would expect that it is valid for two NaN's to equal each other, but
|that because there are many different possible NaN's, they need not
|necessarily equal each other.

No, NaN should not be equal each other in any case, by its definition
(IEEE 754).  I don't know why Sean get "true".

							matz.