From: Dossy <dossy@...>
Date: 2002-05-28T12:17:45+09:00
Subject: Re: using test::unit for C++ unit tests

On 2002.05.27, Phil Tomson <ptkwt@shell1.aracnet.com> wrote:
> >How about CppUnit?
> >
> >  http://cppunit.sourceforge.net/
> 
> Someone else just mentioned this.  I'll check it out.
> 
> >
> >I hear CppUnit is miserable, though.
> 
> Anything specific, or is it just miserable in comparison like C++ in 
> general tends to be 'miserable' to work with compared to Ruby?

I can't comment because I haven't used CppUnit, but I recall it's
supposed to be an attempt at a port of JUnit into C++ which doesn't
work very well.  Or something like that.

-- Dossy

-- 
Dossy Shiobara                       mail: dossy@panoptic.com 
Panoptic Computer Network             web: http://www.panoptic.com/ 
  "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own
    folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)