From: "Bráulio Bhavamitra" <lists@...>
Date: 2013-07-24T22:05:51+09:00
Subject: Re: class <=> module

> That sounds like: We have two different things that behave differently
> and serve different purposes. Why don't we replace them by one thing.
>
> Not very convincing to me... :)
The thing is that sometimes both features, from classes and modules, are 
needed in just one thing.

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.