From: Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...>
Date: 2013-07-23T05:26:37+09:00
Subject: Re: tap { break } idiom deserves its own Kernel method?

--001a11c2bfbe2d8a2b04e21f7e97
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Andy Lowry <lists@ruby-forum.com> wrote:

> I use this idiom from time to time:
>
>   x = expr.tap{|value| break expr-involving-value)}
>

How is this any different than:

    x = expr-involving-value

?

-- 
Tony Arcieri

--001a11c2bfbe2d8a2b04e21f7e97
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Andy Lowry <span dir=3D"=
ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:lists@ruby-forum.com" target=3D"_blank">lists@ru=
by-forum.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=
=3D"gmail_quote">

<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I use this idiom from time to time:<br>
<br>
=A0 x =3D expr.tap{|value| break expr-involving-value)}<br></blockquote><di=
v><br></div><div>How is this any different than:</div><div><br></div><div>=
=A0 =A0 x =3D expr-involving-value</div><div>=A0</div><div>?</div><div><br>=
</div></div>

-- <br>Tony Arcieri<br>
</div></div>

--001a11c2bfbe2d8a2b04e21f7e97--