From: david palm Date: 2013-05-21T01:43:37+09:00 Subject: Re: Is it 'safe' to upgrade to ruby 2.0 by now? --001a11c3e2cc391a5c04dd28b9f4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We've been running 2.0 in production on Heroku now since it came out. No issues related to ruby. On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Panagiotis Atmatzidis wrote: > Hello, > > On 17 =CE=9C=CE=B1=CF=8A 2013, at 16:49 , Hassan Schroeder > wrote: > > > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Panagiotis Atmatzidis > > wrote: > > > >> I'd like to know if do you consider safe upgrading all our programs to > ruby 2.0. > > > > Do your apps' tests pass under 2.0? > > > >> But do you or know if there are gem issues with ruby 2.0? Some gems > might need to get upgraded, some are active other not... > > > > Do the tests of the gems you use pass under 2.0? > > > > That's where I would start, at least. Nobody but you knows all the > > dependencies of your codebase. > > > > -- > > Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.schroeder@gmail.com > > http://about.me/hassanschroeder > > twitter: @hassan > > > > > > Yes everything seems to work perfectly well :-) > > Panagiotis (atmosx) Atmatzidis > > email: atma@convalesco.org > URL: http://www.convalesco.org > GnuPG ID: 0x1A7BFEC5 > gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 1A7BFEC5 > -- > The wise man said: "Never argue with an idiot. They bring you down to > their level and beat you with experience." > > > > --001a11c3e2cc391a5c04dd28b9f4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
We've been running 2.0 in production on Heroku now sin= ce it came out. No issues related to ruby.
=

On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Panagio= tis Atmatzidis <atma@convalesco.org> wrote:
Hello,

On 17 =CE=9C=CE=B1=CF=8A 2013, at 16:49 , Hassan Schroeder <hassan.schroeder@gmail.com> wrote:=

> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Panagiotis Atmatzidis
> <atma@convalesco.org>= wrote:
>
>> I'd like to know if do you consider safe upgrading all our pro= grams to ruby 2.0.
>
> Do your apps' tests pass under 2.0?
>
>> But do you or know if there are gem issues with ruby 2.0? Some gem= s might need to get upgraded, some are active other not...
>
> Do the tests of the gems you use pass under 2.0?
>
> That's where I would start, at least. Nobody but you knows all the=
> dependencies of your codebase.
>
> --
> Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.schroeder@gmail.com
> http://a= bout.me/hassanschroeder
> twitter: @hassan
>



Yes everything seems to work perfectly well :-)

Panagiotis (atmosx) Atmatzidis

email: =C2=A0atma@convalesco.org=
URL: =C2=A0 =C2=A0h= ttp://www.convalesco.org
GnuPG ID: 0x1A7BFEC5
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.ed= u --recv-keys 1A7BFEC5
--
The wise man said: "Never argue with an idiot. They bring you down to = their level and beat you with experience."




--001a11c3e2cc391a5c04dd28b9f4--