From: Adam Prescott <adam@...>
Date: 2013-04-03T19:13:29+09:00
Subject: Re: respond_to? vs include?

--bcaec54860f0e756c204d9721a4f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 3 Apr 2013 08:49, "Robert Klemme" <shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Yeah, Array lookup is O(n) - that's what one would expect.  But the Array
creation has overhead as well.
>

Good catch. Definitely a painful way to implement respond_to? !

--bcaec54860f0e756c204d9721a4f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">On 3 Apr 2013 08:49, &quot;Robert Klemme&quot; &lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:shortcutter@googlemail.com">shortcutter@googlemail.com</a>&gt; w=
rote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Yeah, Array lookup is O(n) - that&#39;s what one would expect. =C2=A0B=
ut the Array creation has overhead as well.<br>
&gt;</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Good catch. Definitely a painful way to implement respond_to=
? !</p>

--bcaec54860f0e756c204d9721a4f--