From: Ryan Davis Date: 2013-03-21T09:00:04+09:00 Subject: Re: Ruby tainting on primitives On Mar 20, 2013, at 15:41 , "Nicolas V." wrote: > Let me formulate it like this: if I wrote a patch for Ruby to support > tainting Fixnums with no performance overhead, would you accept it, or > do you think tainting Fixnums semantically does not make sense? If not, > why? Is there a practical reason to taint a number? Is there something I'm not getting?