From: Carlos Agarie Date: 2013-03-13T09:52:53+09:00 Subject: Re: Ruby 2.0 Thread multitasking? --e89a8f3ba32dfcdaa804d7c36a32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This limitation doesn't exist in JRuby (I'm not sure about the other implementations). I imagine that the guys from MRI team want to remove the Global Interpreter/VM lock, but from what I've read it isn't something trivial. I'd love to be able to help, but I don't know enough (yet). :( ----- Carlos Agarie Skype: carlos.agarie Control engineering Polytechnic School, University of S=E3o Paulo, Brazil Computer engineering Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, USA 2013/3/12 Charles Hixson > (4th attempt at posting: The prior 3 attempts were posts to the > ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org mailing > list ... which certainly *used* to work.) > > Does Ruby 2.0 run more than one thread at a time? The documentation I > have says that Ruby 1.9 does not. > > From what I've read I'm presuming the answer is no, so are there any > plans to remove this limitation? > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > --e89a8f3ba32dfcdaa804d7c36a32 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This limitation doesn't exist in JRuby (I'm not su= re about the other implementations).

I imagine that the guys from MR= I team want to remove the Global Interpreter/VM lock, but from what I'v= e read it isn't something trivial. I'd love to be able to help, but= I don't know enough (yet). :(

-----
Carlos Agarie
Skype: carlos.agarie
Control engineering
Polytechnic School,=A0University of S=E3o Pau= lo, Brazil
Computer engineering
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, U= SA


2013/3/12 Charles Hixson <lists@ruby= -forum.com>
(4th attempt at posting: =A0The prior 3 attempts were posts to the
ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org mail= ing
list ... which certainly *used* to work.)

Does Ruby 2.0 run more than one thread at a time? =A0The documentation I have says that Ruby 1.9 does not.

From what I've read I'm presuming the answer is no, so are there an= y
plans to remove this limitation?

--
Posted via http://= www.ruby-forum.com/.


--e89a8f3ba32dfcdaa804d7c36a32--