From: David Mullet <lists@...>
Date: 2013-03-03T22:02:16+09:00
Subject: Re: Sequel vs. RDBI vs. DBI

Jim Hranicky wrote in post #1099800:
> So it looks like RDBI hasn't been touched in a while and DBI
> appears dormant, so I've been looking at Sequel . I like what
> I've seen so far and I'm just wondering if this would be
> considered "the way to do database programming in ruby"
> (if there is one) ?
>
> I moved from DBI to RDBI a while back and would like to
> stick with something that'll be around and supported
> along with the language.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Jim Hranicky
> IT Security Engineer
> UF Information Technology
> Office of Information Security and Compliance

I'm not prepared to state that Sequel is THE way to do database 
programming in Ruby". But it's a solid choice and is continuously 
updated. I use it daily in a variety of environments: SQL Server or 
SQLite; desktop or server; MRI or JRuby.

David

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.