From: Nat Pryce <nat.pryce@...13media.com>
Date: 2002-05-16T20:14:40+09:00
Subject: Re: The various UnitTest frameworks.

Go for Test::Unit.  It supersedes both Lapidary and RubyUnit and will
eventually be part of Ruby's standard library.

Cheers,
            Nat.
________________________________
Dr. Nathaniel Pryce
B13media Ltd.
Studio 3a, Aberdeen Business Centre, 22/24 Highbury Grove, London, N5 2EA
http://www.b13media.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Carter" <john.carter@tait.co.nz>
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:53 PM
Subject: The various UnitTest frameworks.


> Looking in RAA I see three UnitTest frameworks...
>   http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/raa-list.rhtml?name=Lapidary
>   http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/raa-list.rhtml?name=Test%3A%3AUnit
>   http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/raa-list.rhtml?name=RubyUnit
>
> Curiously enough there seems to be two by Nathaniel Talbott
>
> Any recommendations / comparisons?
>
>
> John Carter                             Phone : (64)(3) 358 6639
> Tait Electronics                        Fax   : (64)(3) 359 4632
> PO Box 1645 Christchurch                Email : john.carter@tait.co.nz
> New Zealand
>
> May contain traces of nuts. This email was packed by mass, not
> volume. Contents may have settled during distribution.
> This email is not designed or intended for use in on-line control of
> aircraft, air traffic, aircraft navigation or aircraft communications; or
in
> the design, construction, operation or maintenance of any nuclear
> facility. Reader represents and warrants that it will not use or
> redistribute the email for such purposes.
>