From: Tim0 <tigre7t@...>
Date: 2013-02-25T07:05:23+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] RubyInstaller 2.0.0-p0 released

------=_Part_709_28558883.1361743521809
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_710_26558829.1361743521810"

------=_Part_710_26558829.1361743521810
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



> >{....
> * Existing pre-compiled gems are not Ruby 2.0 compatible 
>
> Ruby 2.0 introduces ABI breakage which means compiled C extensions with 
> previous *1.9.3 will work* with Ruby 2.0.  
>
> DO NOT install Ruby 2.0 on top of existing Ruby 1.9.3, or try to use 
> compiled 
> extensions with it. ..}
>


Hi Luis 
Congratulations for the long-awaited Ruby 2.0 p0 exe  
may i just ask
when i read  '..gems will not work' and next sentence
compiled C extensions '*1.9.3 will work'
*
is the word 'not' missing in the latter sentence?

best regards
Tim0

------=_Part_710_26558829.1361743521810
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">
&gt;{....<br>* Existing pre-compiled gems are not Ruby 2.0 compatible
<br>
<br>Ruby 2.0 introduces ABI breakage which means compiled C extensions with previous
<u>1.9.3 will work</u> with Ruby 2.0.&nbsp;
<br>
<br>DO NOT install Ruby 2.0 on top of existing Ruby 1.9.3, or try to use compiled
<br>extensions with it.
..}<br></blockquote><div><br><br>Hi Luis <br>Congratulations for the long-awaited Ruby 2.0 p0 exe&nbsp; <br>may i just ask<br>when i read&nbsp; '..gems will not work' and next sentence<br>compiled C extensions '<u>1.9.3 will work'<br></u><br>is the word 'not' missing in the latter sentence?<br><br>best regards<br>Tim0<br></div>
------=_Part_710_26558829.1361743521810--

------=_Part_709_28558883.1361743521809--