From: Pat Eyler <pate@...>
Date: 2002-05-16T10:12:49+09:00
Subject: Re: The various UnitTest frameworks.

On Thu, 16 May 2002, John Carter wrote:

> Looking in RAA I see three UnitTest frameworks...
>   http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/raa-list.rhtml?name=Lapidary
>   http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/raa-list.rhtml?name=Test%3A%3AUnit
>   http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/raa-list.rhtml?name=RubyUnit
>
> Curiously enough there seems to be two by Nathaniel Talbott
>
> Any recommendations / comparisons?
>
>

In the beginning, there was RubyUnit and it was good.  Nathaniel Talbot
then wrote Lapidary , and it was good to.  Nathanel and others then wrote
Test::Unit which supercedes the other two.

-pate


> John Carter                             Phone : (64)(3) 358 6639
> Tait Electronics                        Fax   : (64)(3) 359 4632
> PO Box 1645 Christchurch                Email : john.carter@tait.co.nz
> New Zealand
>
> May contain traces of nuts. This email was packed by mass, not
> volume. Contents may have settled during distribution.
> This email is not designed or intended for use in on-line control of
> aircraft, air traffic, aircraft navigation or aircraft communications; or in
> the design, construction, operation or maintenance of any nuclear
> facility. Reader represents and warrants that it will not use or
> redistribute the email for such purposes.
>
>