From: Mike Stok <mike@...>
Date: 2002-05-16T09:00:46+09:00
Subject: Re: The various UnitTest frameworks.

In article <200205151619.57609.brian@coolnamehere.com>, Brian Wisti wrote:
> Hi John,
> 
> Lapidary is no more.  I think it's now RubyUnit.  I've been learning to use 
> RubyUnit, and it's gotten me really excited about the whole unit testing 
> thing.  I can't offer a comparison between RubyUnit and Test::Unit, though.  
> Somebody else is bound to have useful information on that.

Unit::Test has a RubyUnit compatibility feature (e.g REXML has runit style
tests in its test suite, and they still work under Test::Unit.)

Mike

-- 
mike@stok.co.uk                    |           The "`Stok' disclaimers" apply.
http://www.stok.co.uk/~mike/       | GPG PGP Key      1024D/059913DA 
mike@exegenix.com                  | Fingerprint      0570 71CD 6790 7C28 3D60
http://www.exegenix.com/           |                  75D2 9EC4 C1C0 0599 13DA