From: Edoardo Rossi <edd.rossi@...>
Date: 2013-02-14T22:02:20+09:00
Subject: Re: Best DRY way to write bang versions of methods?

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Joel Pearson <lists@ruby-forum.com> wrote:
> That's an interesting way to do it. If I assume that any bang method I
> write in a given class would also have a non-bang method, then I could
> easily have a catch-all process define the methods for me when an
> instance is generated. Cool!
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>

Yup!
Hope this helps... happy hacking.
By the way... pay attention at all the consequences of 'dup'
See: http://ruby-doc.org/core-1.9.3/Object.html#method-i-dup

e.