From: Ronnie Aa <lists@...>
Date: 2013-02-11T23:13:51+09:00
Subject: Re: firtst and only element of array (noob level)

Carlo E. Prelz wrote in post #1096281:
> Subject: Re: firtst and only element of array (noob level)
>   Date: lun 11 feb 13 10:43:27 +0900
>
> Quoting Ronnie Aa (lists@ruby-forum.com):
>
>> Yes but when the array contains only ONE element
>> there's no real need to indicate the position of that element.
>> So i want to use arr as if it was arr[0]. But that's no possible..
>
> You have to think of the array as the chest of apples. When you have
> only one apple left, the chest does not disappear. If it did, the
> fact would generate a lot of confusion...
>
> Carlo

Ok I see thnx

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.