From: Ano Hito <lists@...>
Date: 2013-02-11T17:49:04+09:00
Subject: Re: Why doesn't Ruby have a built in sandbox class?

Robert Klemme wrote in post #1096227:
> I don't have enough time to follow up on the rest of the discussion
> but with regard to timing: 2.0 is RC already and with what you say
> above you acknowledge that architectural changes of MRI are a major
> effort.
>
> http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2013/02/08/ruby-2-0-0-rc2-is-released/

Ah, ok, things are quite far along. 3.0 it is then. Incidentally, this 
bullet point is relevant to my interests regarding the project I was 
originally inquiring about in my other thread: "NativeClient support". 
That may prove to be a better option for my project than jruby, as 
NativeClient modules are already loaded in a heavily protected sandbox, 
which lets me be a little more comfortable relying on safe levels. Then 
again, I also just found out about this 
(http://qiezi.me/2013/01/09/webruby-1-2-3-tutorial/), which has a fair 
amount of advantages, such as not requiring chrome, and having a very 
snappy load time. Nice to know there are getting to be more options for 
running ruby in the browser.

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.