From: sto.mar@...
Date: 2013-02-05T23:27:42+09:00
Subject: Re: old syntax? what's going on here

Am 05.02.2013 15:08, schrieb Carlo E. Prelz:
> 	Subject: Re: old syntax? what's going on here
> 	Date: mar 05 feb 13 10:54:39 +0900
>
> Quoting tamouse mailing lists (tamouse.lists@gmail.com):
>
>> Sure enough, Carlos. Now it syntax checks. But on to other problems,
>> namely with the Open3.expects and a later Open3.stub. I'm guessing I
>> need some kind of mocker; the .gemspec refers to mocha, which I'm
>> trying to look into.
>
> (it is Carlo, not Carlos - I am Italian... Nothing against the
> Spaniards and the Portuguese, of course)
>
> I never used Open3 (never needed). But if I type
>
> ri expects
>
> nothing appears. There must be yet another syntax error, in the sense
> that you should have expect, not expects. Indeed, if I type

No! As long as you do not have the same gems on your machine as
have been used for tamouse's project, that tells you nothing.

The Mocha::Mock class from the mentioned mocha gem class
*has* an expects method.

> ri expect
>
> I obtain (among others):
>
> --8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<--
> === Implementation from Mock
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    expect(name, retval, args=[], &blk)
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Expect that method name is called, optionally with args or a blk, and
> returns
> retval.
>
>    @mock.expect(:meaning_of_life, 42)
>    @mock.meaning_of_life # => 42
>
>    @mock.expect(:do_something_with, true, [some_obj, true])
>    @mock.do_something_with(some_obj, true) # => true
>
>    @mock.expect(:do_something_else, true) do |a1, a2|
>      a1 == "buggs" && a2 == :bunny
>    end
>
> args is compared to the expected args using case equality (ie, the
> '==='
> operator), allowing for less specific expectations.
>
>    @mock.expect(:uses_any_string, true, [String])
>    @mock.uses_any_string("foo") # => true
>    @mock.verify  # => true
>
>    @mock.expect(:uses_one_string, true, ["foo"]
>    @mock.uses_one_string("bar") # => true
>    @mock.verify  # => raises MockExpectationError
> --8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<--
>
> Then, if I ask ri for Mock, nothing comes out, I never used Mock
> myself - I know nothing about that. Hmm... looks like this doc is a
> leftover from an old installation (mock seems to have been part of
> Ruby in the past but it is not there anymore). I expect you will find
> stuff about Mock on the net.
>
> Carlo

No!

The Mock class you are talking about is part of MiniTest,
and rather new.


-- 
<https://github.com/stomar/>