From: Martin DeMello Date: 2012-12-17T09:44:40+09:00 Subject: Re: current state of qtruby? Incidentally, for anyone else interested in qt language bindings, I just discovered EQL, which looks excellent: http://password-taxi.at/EQL martin On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Martin DeMello wrote: > Thanks, everyone. I got qtbindings up and running; qt_connect looks > interesting but still seems a little flaky on my system. (I'll play > with it some more and file bugs). I'll check out the examples people > pointed me to, together with the qt docs I should be in good shape. > > martin > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:18 AM, Martin DeMello wrote: >> I did a small Python/Qt project at work that has gotten me pretty >> excited about Qt. However from googling around, the only languages >> people seem to be actively using to write Qt apps are C++ and Python. >> >> So, a few questions: >> >> 1. What is the current state of Qt and Ruby, in terms of people >> keeping bindings up to date, and people using it for projects? >> 2. Am I right that the qtbindings and qt_connect gems are the current >> best way to go? >> 3. Are there working scintilla and webkit bindings? >> 4. Is anyone using Qt 4.8 + Ruby 1.9.3 for an active open source >> project I can take a look at? >> >> martin