From: Martin DeMello <martindemello@...>
Date: 2012-11-24T13:21:09+09:00
Subject: Re: Metaprogramming

The code looks fine to me - is there any particular piece you aren't happy with?

One improvement I can see is that self.attribute could be def
self.attribute(name, params = {})

1.9.3-p327 :016 > def f(name, params={})
1.9.3-p327 :017?>   p [name, params]
1.9.3-p327 :018?>   end
 => nil
1.9.3-p327 :019 > f('hello')
["hello", {}]
 => ["hello", {}]
1.9.3-p327 :020 > f('a', :b => true, :c => 'd')
["a", {:b=>true, :c=>"d"}]
 => ["a", {:b=>true, :c=>"d"}]

That will save you the if params check everywhere.

martin

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Aurimas N. <lists@ruby-forum.com> wrote:
> :DDD Why everybody thinks I do not know anything about ruby?
>
> I have already figured out the way that I want to do. Here you can look
> at it maybe something better you would suggest:
>
> https://github.com/gcds/libeagle/blob/New-Way/lib/libeagle/base.rb
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>