[#399938] how to read arrary with an array — "Richard D." <lists@...>

Hello. I believe this is basic question, but I'm just starting to learn

19 messages 2012/10/02

[#400050] img src while sending email ruby cgi — Ferdous ara <lists@...>

Hi

16 messages 2012/10/05

[#400351] Drop 1st and last particular character — ajay paswan <lists@...>

What is the most efficient way to drop '#' from the first place and last

15 messages 2012/10/16

[#400374] database part of a desktop application — "Sebastjan H." <lists@...>

Hi,

14 messages 2012/10/16
[#400375] Re: database part of a desktop application — Chad Perrin <code@...> 2012/10/16

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 05:28:39AM +0900, Sebastjan H. wrote:

[#400377] Re: database part of a desktop application — sto.mar@... 2012/10/17

Am 16.10.2012 23:24, schrieb Chad Perrin:

[#400389] Re: database part of a desktop application — Chad Perrin <code@...> 2012/10/17

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:39:21PM +0900, sto.mar@web.de wrote:

[#400386] Unable to send attachment, and dealing with multiple attachment — ajay paswan <lists@...>

Hi,

11 messages 2012/10/17

[#400454] Hash with Integer key issue — Wayne Simmerson <lists@...>

Hi Im new to Ruby and am getting some unexpected results from a

18 messages 2012/10/19

[#400535] Name/symbol/object type clash? What is happening here? — Todd Benson <caduceass@...>

It's nonsense code, but I'm curious as to what is going on behind the scenes...

41 messages 2012/10/23

[#400556] Calling a method foo() or an object foo.method_call_here - both — Marc Heiler <lists@...>

Hello.

13 messages 2012/10/24

[#400650] OpenSSL ECDSA public key from private — Nokan Emiro <uzleepito@...>

Hi,

11 messages 2012/10/27

[#400680] Passing folder as argument ARGV? — Joz Private <lists@...>

Is there an easy way to pass multiple files on the command line?

15 messages 2012/10/28
[#400681] Re: Passing folder as argument ARGV? — brad smith <bradleydsmith@...> 2012/10/28

How are you traversing the directory you pass in on the command line ?

[#400697] File.readable? and /proc — Jeff Moore <lists@...>

root@nail:/projects/proc_fs# uname -a

13 messages 2012/10/28

[#400714] Marshal.load weird issue — "Pierre J." <lists@...>

Hi guys

12 messages 2012/10/28

[#400781] bug?: local variable created in if modifier not available in modified expression — "Mean L." <lists@...>

irb(main):001:0> local1 if local1 = "created"

21 messages 2012/10/30
[#400807] Re: bug?: local variable created in if modifier not available in modified expression — Bartosz Dziewoński <matma.rex@...> 2012/10/31

Oh, and in case it wasn't apparent: you can just add

[#400808] Re: bug?: local variable created in if modifier not available in modified expression — Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@...> 2012/10/31

On 10/31/2012 4:52 PM, Bartosz Dziewoナгki wrote:

[#400809] Re: bug?: local variable created in if modifier not available in modified expression — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2012/10/31

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@ngtech.co.il>wrote:

[#400784] REXML & HTMLentities incorrectly map to UTF-8 — "Mark S." <lists@...>

I have some XML data (UTF 8) that I'm trying to convert into another XML

13 messages 2012/10/30

Re: Name/symbol/object type clash? What is happening here?

From: Igor Pirnovar <lists@...>
Date: 2012-10-25 20:22:10 UTC
List: ruby-talk #400614
Yossef Mendelssohn wrote in post #1081211:

> Just because something doesn't work the way you insist it must doesn't
> mean it's broken.

If you claim that using accessors and '@' variables when reopening
Struct classes with class idiom isn't broken, that's fine, but my last
example I gave, clearly indicates differently!  If you do not need it to
be consistent in those simple circumstances you use Struct idiom, that
by no means discredits a more elaborate use, which clearly is broken,
redundant and inconsistent, as I have shown in my previous sample code
snippet, where you need to annul the Struct by the {{ attr_accessor :num
}} line when you reopen the 'S' class, in order to be able to define
more elaborate custom initialization accessor methods.

Let's not waste any more time on this issue. I think we all can tolerate
this apparent glitch. At the same time reiterating that there should be
as few exceptions as possible in the language grammar and its use
certainly is not an out of line proposition. Our discourse, as far as I
am concerned has pointed to all these points, and any previous as well
as further suggestions that Ruby is broken, have nothing to do with what
was originally intended.

Regards, igor

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

In This Thread