From: Holden Glova <dsafari@...>
Date: 2002-05-09T17:04:32+09:00
Subject: Re: CGI API Rant

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 09 May 2002 17:47, Curt Sampson wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Thomas Hurst wrote:
> > I fail to see how HTML generation makes a good mixin for cgi....
>
> It doesn't. I agree that these ought to be two separate things.
>
> > What I might like a CGI API to look like (more to invoke
> > comment/discussion than anything else):
> >
> > Seperate objects for the request and the response. [etc.]
>
> What I want to see is a Ruby version Java's Servlets. I should be
> able to pass the request on to some other bit of code if I don't
> want to deal with it, post-process that other bit of code's response,
> and all of that, too.
>
> cjs

While WEBrick does not try to be Java Servlets (that has been openly stated 
on WEBrick ML) it does have what I think is a nicer interface for dealing 
with the HTTP request/response. Give it a try.

http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/raa-list.rhtml?name=WEBrick

- -- 
Signed,
Holden Glova
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE82izL+mF116Lw2cQRAmJ/AJsEf00A1CngxsuSA7FRcFa84GvYKACeOoH9
dlveEOLvzfrljLW2iN3BCy4=
=kpt2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----