From: Jam <jam@...>
Date: 2012-08-12T12:12:13+09:00
Subject: Re: any equivalence for real browser testing?

Hey dude,

I don't mean to sound like an ass, but if you're writing the framework it seems like benchmarking these things yourself should be the best way to answer your questions. 

Jams

On Aug 11, 2012, at 2:45 PM, ajay paswan <lists@ruby-forum.com> wrote:

> I am writing a s/w testing framework using ruby, it needs to be fast.
> The amount taking by a browser to start, then shift control to another
> component and closing is really slow, I was thinking, is there any
> equivalent fast way to do the same with the same level of confidence, I
> mean same level of trust/test. As i have heard/studied that the real
> browser testing is must, it gives the real testing environment. please
> suggest some faster way, but I dont want to negotiate in the quality of
> testing as browser gives.
> 
> One more thing I would like to know, closing a browser and again
> starting it for a new test is faster or using the same browser for next
> test is wise? in terms of times consumption.
> 
> -- 
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>