From: "Jan E." <lists@...>
Date: 2012-07-05T01:24:05+09:00
Subject: Re: Green threads in 1.9.* ?

rex goxman wrote in post #1067433:
> Well, for the purposes here, if Ruby's threads were green threads, yes
> they would have been comparable to Erlang green processes.  My emphasis
> is far more on the "green" and far less on whether it is a process or a
> thread.

Ruby 1.8 *has* green threads. It's explained in Xavier's link, and I 
also mentioned it above.

You seem to misread "some implementations have native threads" as "all 
have native threads".

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.