[#397093] Using binding + set_trace_func to capture execution state — Reginald Tan <lists@...>

Hi guys, I'm interested in building a program that will display the

18 messages 2012/07/03
[#397097] Re: Using binding + set_trace_func to capture execution state — Peter Zotov <whitequark@...> 2012/07/03

Reginald Tan писал 03.07.2012 05:11:

[#397115] Copying Files — "Alex C." <lists@...>

Hi,

17 messages 2012/07/03

[#397165] Green threads in 1.9.* ? — rex goxman <lists@...>

I am new to Ruby. I am somewhat surprised that I was not able to find

56 messages 2012/07/04
[#397224] Re: Green threads in 1.9.* ? — rex goxman <lists@...> 2012/07/05

<<There are definitely many reasons to prefer native threads over green

[#397227] Re: Green threads in 1.9.* ? — Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...> 2012/07/05

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 6:38 AM, rex goxman <lists@ruby-forum.com> wrote:

[#397232] Re: Green threads in 1.9.* ? — rex goxman <lists@...> 2012/07/05

Tony Arcieri wrote in post #1067551:

[#397234] Re: Green threads in 1.9.* ? — Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...> 2012/07/05

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:26 AM, rex goxman <lists@ruby-forum.com> wrote:

[#397239] Re: Green threads in 1.9.* ? — rex goxman <lists@...> 2012/07/05

Tony Arcieri wrote in post #1067563:

[#397251] Re: Green threads in 1.9.* ? — Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...> 2012/07/06

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:31 PM, rex goxman <lists@ruby-forum.com> wrote:

[#397253] Re: Green threads in 1.9.* ? — rex goxman <lists@...> 2012/07/06

Tony Arcieri wrote in post #1067609:

[#397256] Re: Green threads in 1.9.* ? — Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...> 2012/07/06

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 8:24 PM, rex goxman <lists@ruby-forum.com> wrote:

[#397260] Re: Green threads in 1.9.* ? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2012/07/06

[#397267] Re: Green threads in 1.9.* ? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2012/07/06

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:

[#397269] Re: Green threads in 1.9.* ? — rex goxman <lists@...> 2012/07/06

Robert Klemme wrote in post #1067663:

[#397185] Insert letters of the alphabet between the original letters of a string — Joao Silva <lists@...>

Hi All.

10 messages 2012/07/04

[#397198] the best way to match these domains. — Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@...>

thanks in advance i need a bit help to break the ice that my head is in.

18 messages 2012/07/05
[#397202] Re: the best way to match these domains. — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2012/07/05

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@ngtech.co.il> wrote:

[#397245] Re: the best way to match these domains. — Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@...> 2012/07/05

On 7/5/2012 10:03 AM, Robert Klemme wrote:

[#397258] Re: the best way to match these domains. — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2012/07/06

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@ngtech.co.il> wrote:

[#397316] Re: the best way to match these domains. — Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@...> 2012/07/07

On 7/6/2012 9:21 AM, Robert Klemme wrote:

[#397415] Re: the best way to match these domains. — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2012/07/10

On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@ngtech.co.il> wrote:

[#397464] Re: the best way to match these domains. — Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@...> 2012/07/11

On 7/10/2012 12:08 PM, Robert Klemme wrote:

[#397416] learning by doing part 2 - tc game — "Sebastjan H." <lists@...>

Hi,

53 messages 2012/07/10
[#397418] Re: learning by doing part 2 - tc game — "Jan E." <lists@...> 2012/07/10

Hi,

[#397419] Re: learning by doing part 2 - tc game — "Sebastjan H." <lists@...> 2012/07/10

Yes, that would be ok, but that means that the player has to create all

[#397421] Re: learning by doing part 2 - tc game — Jes俍 Gabriel y Gal疣 <jgabrielygalan@...> 2012/07/10

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Sebastjan H. <lists@ruby-forum.com> wrote:

[#397423] Re: learning by doing part 2 - tc game — "Jan E." <lists@...> 2012/07/10

"Jes=C3=BAs Gabriel y Gal=C3=A1n" <jgabrielygalan@gmail.com> wrote in pos=

[#397424] Re: learning by doing part 2 - tc game — "Sebastjan H." <lists@...> 2012/07/10

Jan E. wrote in post #1068109:

[#397426] Re: learning by doing part 2 - tc game — "Jan E." <lists@...> 2012/07/10

Sebastjan H. wrote in post #1068110:

[#397428] Re: learning by doing part 2 - tc game — "Sebastjan H." <lists@...> 2012/07/10

Jan E. wrote in post #1068114:

[#397429] Re: learning by doing part 2 - tc game — "Jan E." <lists@...> 2012/07/10

Sebastjan H. wrote in post #1068117:

[#397430] Re: learning by doing part 2 - tc game — "Sebastjan H." <lists@...> 2012/07/10

Jan E. wrote in post #1068119:

[#397435] Re: learning by doing part 2 - tc game — Jes俍 Gabriel y Gal疣 <jgabrielygalan@...> 2012/07/10

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Sebastjan H. <lists@ruby-forum.com> wrote:

[#397608] undefined method error — deal bitte <lists@...>

rid.database_columns[session_db_array[0]]

17 messages 2012/07/17

[#397685] odd "system" command behaviour with CUI and GUI — Joel Pearson <lists@...>

Windows 7 64-bit, Ruby 1.9.3.

12 messages 2012/07/20

[#397738] Help a blind man getting ruby to work — "Morten T." <lists@...>

Hallo,

14 messages 2012/07/23

[#397806] Help with exercise from Chris Pine's Ruby Book: Sort without using .sort — "James H." <lists@...>

Hello all, I'm a n00b that's just getting into programming.

16 messages 2012/07/25

[#397817] modular exponentation with multiple exponents? — roob noob <lists@...>

I need to do a^b^c^d^e mod f

11 messages 2012/07/25

[#397903] How to test whether a session variable has a particular key — Doug Jolley <lists@...>

Although a session variable behaves like a hash for purposes of setting

11 messages 2012/07/30

Re: ruby performance

From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
Date: 2012-07-02 06:40:07 UTC
List: ruby-talk #397068
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Bartosz Dziewo=C5=84ski <matma.rex@gmail.co=
m> wrote:
> 2012/7/1 Andreas S. <lists@ruby-forum.com>:
>>
>> A loop with no payload is a completely useless benchmarking scenario.
>
> You are wrong. It's the same as benchmarking a loop with a payload,
> without benchmarking the payload. You could also consider the payload
> to be integer incrementation.

I am going to place myself right between your chairs.  I think both of
you have it wrong. :-))

A loop without payload is not completely useless - but it only tells
you about a very artificial test case.  If the payload is more
expensive than the looping and both languages have less differences
there (e.g. because logic is IO bound) then the looping test does not
really help much for the real case.  Similarly if the real code does
not involve looping at all because other algorithms are chosen. :-)

Kind regards

robert

--=20
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/

In This Thread