From: Intransition <transfire@...>
Date: 2012-06-15T02:12:10+09:00
Subject: Re: Syntax Highlighter

------=_Part_61_6952558.1339693927510
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_62_15122479.1339693927510"

------=_Part_62_15122479.1339693927510
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



On Thursday, June 14, 2012 10:39:55 AM UTC-4, Ralf Mueller wrote:
>
> On 06/14/2012 04:07 PM, Intransition wrote: 
> > Would you agree that Ruby shouldn't lack for a syntax highlighting 
> library as good as any that exists for 
> > other dynamic languages? I do. But as it stands Ruby lags well behind 
> Python's Pygments 
> > (http://pygments.org/). This should not stand! 
> > 
> > Ruby has a pretty good library in CodeRay (http://coderay.rubychan.de/) 
> but to catch up it needs to support 
> > many more formats. 
>
> If you have a look, on what is scheduled for 1.1, there is a lot to come. 
> But the problem is, when it will 
> code. I added fortran support to coderay more than 2 years ago, but it 
> still hasn't made it into any release. 
> Dont get me wrong, no criticism here. A lot of people seem to have written 
> valid scanners. Might be good to 
> have a place to share them. 
>

Oh, where is this scanner? Could you submit as a pull request with it?
 

------=_Part_62_15122479.1339693927510
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<br><br>On Thursday, June 14, 2012 10:39:55 AM UTC-4, Ralf Mueller wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">On 06/14/2012 04:07 PM, Intransition wrote:
<br>&gt; Would you agree that Ruby shouldn't lack for a syntax highlighting library as good as any that exists for 
<br>&gt; other dynamic languages? I do. But as it stands Ruby lags well behind Python's Pygments 
<br>&gt; (<a href="http://pygments.org/" target="_blank">http://pygments.org/</a>). This should not stand!
<br>&gt;
<br>&gt; Ruby has a pretty good library in CodeRay (<a href="http://coderay.rubychan.de/" target="_blank">http://coderay.rubychan.de/</a>) but to catch up it needs to support 
<br>&gt; many more formats.
<br>
<br>If you have a look, on what is scheduled for 1.1, there is a lot to come. But the problem is, when it will 
<br>code. I added fortran support to coderay more than 2 years ago, but it still hasn't made it into any release. 
<br>Dont get me wrong, no criticism here. A lot of people seem to have written valid scanners. Might be good to 
<br>have a place to share them.
<br></blockquote><div><br>Oh, where is this scanner? Could you submit as a pull request with it?<br>&nbsp;<br></div>
------=_Part_62_15122479.1339693927510--

------=_Part_61_6952558.1339693927510--