From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@...>
Date: 2012-05-24T18:55:29+09:00
Subject: Re: looking for a ruby idiom : r=foo; return r if r

On 24 May 2012 19:30, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> r = foo and return r
>
> Hint: different precedence of "and" compared to "&&" makes this
> possible without the brackets that Matthew hat to use.

I knew I was missing something. Thank you Robert.

-- 
  Matthew Kerwin, B.Sc (CompSci) (Hons)
  http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/
  ABN: 59-013-727-651

  "You'll never find a programming language that frees
  you from the burden of clarifying your ideas." - xkcd