From: "Bartosz Dziewoński" <matma.rex@...>
Date: 2012-04-06T06:19:51+09:00
Subject: Re: Design pattern question

W dniu 5 kwietnia 2012 21:27 użytkownik Steve Klabnik
 <steve@steveklabnik.com> napisał:
> We'll have to agree to disagree on this one, Ryan. Abstract classes
 > are pretty silly in Ruby. Then again, I find subclassing distasteful
 > in general, so this might just be a style/preference thing.

Abstract classes are sometimes useful (although rarely). For example,
 how else could you do the kind of database adapter handling Sequel[1]
 does?

 [1] http://rubygems.org/gems/sequel


 -- Matma Rex