From: Catsquotl <Catsquotl@...>
Date: 2012-02-24T21:41:46+09:00
Subject: Re: cheered to soon enumerable woos

Thank you,

After reading your post i took another look at what i was trying to do.
As i am just playing with different ide's, different irb setups and 
Rspec testing. I missed what exactly was happening.
I had hoped to be able to use include? to return true even on a 
substring. It does not do so in Arrays.
Also i wanted my search method to return either true or false, but with 
the each(&block) coded as it is
the search method will return the entire array defined in each
  rendering my result.should == true or false useless...

Anyway I settled on the following.

   def each(&block)
     [@afk, @name, @chname, @locatie, @aard, @actie].flatten.each(&block)
   end

   def search str
      self.each do|n|
        if n.match(str) then
          return true
        end
      end
   end

I do have the notion that search could be changed to return true or 
false, but this way i can test whether it is true or not_true.
And the class does what it needs to do...

Eelco
> Btw. that method should conventionally return "self" at the end.
>
> Kind regards
>
> robert
>
>