[#393012] Basic Ruby performance — Dmitry Nikiforov <dniq@...>

Hello all!

43 messages 2012/02/02
[#393013] Re: Basic Ruby performance — Dmitry Nikiforov <dniq@...> 2012/02/02

Here's another example with significantly bigger performance difference:

[#393015] Re: Basic Ruby performance — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2012/02/02

[#393016] Re: Basic Ruby performance — Peter Vandenabeele <peter@...> 2012/02/02

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com>wrote:

[#393020] Re: Basic Ruby performance — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2012/02/03

[#393076] Problem migrating to Ruby 1.9.2 — Patrick Bayford <pbayford@...>

Some assistance please - I have a Ruby project, which I started in Ruby

10 messages 2012/02/03

[#393164] Using _ like in Scala? — Marc Heiler <shevegen@...>

fruits = %w( apple banana orange )

27 messages 2012/02/06
[#393201] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...> 2012/02/07

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Marc Heiler <shevegen@linuxmail.org> wrote:

[#393204] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Eric Christopherson <echristopherson@...> 2012/02/07

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@gmail.com> wrote:

[#393206] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...> 2012/02/07

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Eric Christopherson <

[#393208] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Kevin <darkintent@...> 2012/02/07

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@gmail.com> wrote:

[#393216] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2012/02/07

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Kevin <darkintent@gmail.com> wrote:

[#393219] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...> 2012/02/07

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>wrote:

[#393220] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2012/02/07

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> wrote:

[#393240] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...> 2012/02/08

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>wrote:

[#393254] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2012/02/08

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> wrote:

[#393259] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...> 2012/02/08

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>wrote:

[#393181] Tork 18.0.0 — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...>

Tork - Test with fork - https://github.com/sunaku/tork#readme

16 messages 2012/02/06
[#393183] Re: [ANN] Tork 18.0.0 — Bartosz Dziewoński <matma.rex@...> 2012/02/06

You have faster major version release cycle than Chrome...

[#393189] Re: [ANN] Tork 18.0.0 — Quintus <sutniuq@...> 2012/02/06

Am 06.02.2012 22:07, schrieb Bartosz Dziewoナгki:

[#393203] Re: Tork 18.0.0 — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...> 2012/02/07

Marvin G=C3=BClker wrote in post #1044440:

[#393347] Symbol garbage collection — Dido Sevilla <dido.sevilla@...>

I've always wondered why Ruby didn't do garbage collection of symbols,

13 messages 2012/02/10

[#393402] Who Administrates this list and how can the community help save this list from the noise. — andrew mcelroy <sophrinix@...>

It is very clear that this list has been under a incredibly heavy

21 messages 2012/02/11
[#393403] Re: Who Administrates this list and how can the community help save this list from the noise. — serialhex <serialhex@...> 2012/02/11

+1

[#393407] Re: Who Administrates this list and how can the community help save this list from the noise. — Cathy Alomari <cathy1428@...> 2012/02/11

Good luck, I doubt anyone is paying attention. I have seen numerous

[#393410] Re: Who Administrates this list and how can the community help save this list from the noise. — "Darryl L. Pierce" <mcpierce@...> 2012/02/11

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Cathy Alomari <cathy1428@gmail.com> wrote:

[#393430] Re: Who Administrates this list and how can the community help save this list from the noise. — Cathy Alomari <cathy1428@...> 2012/02/13

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Darryl L. Pierce <mcpierce@gmail.com>wrote:

[#393432] Re: Who Administrates this list and how can the community help save this list from the noise. — Bartosz Dziewoński <matma.rex@...> 2012/02/13

2012/2/13 Cathy Alomari <cathy1428@gmail.com>:

[#393434] Re: Who Administrates this list and how can the community help save this list from the noise. — Rimantas Liubertas <rimantas@...> 2012/02/13

> Have you tried mailing ruby-talk-ctl@ruby-lang.org (mailto:ruby-talk-ctl@ruby-lang.org) with "unsubscribe"

[#393412] the ruby syntax — maven apache <apachemaven0@...>

Hi:

19 messages 2012/02/12
[#393413] Re: the ruby syntax — Bartosz Dziewoński <matma.rex@...> 2012/02/12

When a hash is the last argument to a method, you can skip its open-

[#393416] Re: the ruby syntax — maven apache <apachemaven0@...> 2012/02/12

2012/2/12 Bartosz Dziewo=C5=84ski <matma.rex@gmail.com>

[#393435] Re: the ruby syntax — Saji Hameed <saji@...> 2012/02/13

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:49 PM, maven apache <apachemaven0@gmail.com> wro=

[#393546] Difference between 1.9.2 and 1.9.3 — James French <James.French@...>

module A <- line 1

12 messages 2012/02/20
[#393558] Re: Difference between 1.9.2 and 1.9.3 — Dave Aronson <rubytalk2dave@...> 2012/02/21

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:25, James French

[#393548] Accessing a local variable through a symbol — Ralph Shnelvar <ralphs@...32.com>

Let's say I have

11 messages 2012/02/20

[#393671] Rubymoticons — Dave Aronson <rubytalk2dave@...>

I was demonstrating injection of a symbol, and noticed a familiar

12 messages 2012/02/28

[Ann] pdf-toolkit 1.0.0.rc1 released!

From: Bernard Lambeau <blambeau@...>
Date: 2012-02-08 09:58:19 UTC
List: ruby-talk #393251
Hi Rubyists!

pdf-toolkit has just been released.

*=A0https://github.com/blambeau/pdf-toolkit
* https://rubygems.org/gems/pdf-toolkit

pdf-toolkit is an interface to the pdftk commandline tool, allowing to
read/write pdf metadata.

This version is an overal cleanup of the project and source code from
the original, (abandoned) 0.5.0 version by Tim Pope. The main
difference with the original version is that support for ActiveRecord
has been removed (implementation was ugly). As it might be an
important broken API (already announced, though), this is a prerelease
version instead of a proper 1.0.0. Please let me know if you still use
pdf-toolkit and use/would like support for ActiveRecord in the future.
Otherwise, I'll release 1.0 in a couple of days.

Bernard

In This Thread

Prev Next