[#393012] Basic Ruby performance — Dmitry Nikiforov <dniq@...>

Hello all!

43 messages 2012/02/02
[#393013] Re: Basic Ruby performance — Dmitry Nikiforov <dniq@...> 2012/02/02

Here's another example with significantly bigger performance difference:

[#393015] Re: Basic Ruby performance — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2012/02/02

[#393016] Re: Basic Ruby performance — Peter Vandenabeele <peter@...> 2012/02/02

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com>wrote:

[#393020] Re: Basic Ruby performance — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2012/02/03

[#393076] Problem migrating to Ruby 1.9.2 — Patrick Bayford <pbayford@...>

Some assistance please - I have a Ruby project, which I started in Ruby

10 messages 2012/02/03

[#393164] Using _ like in Scala? — Marc Heiler <shevegen@...>

fruits = %w( apple banana orange )

27 messages 2012/02/06
[#393201] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...> 2012/02/07

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Marc Heiler <shevegen@linuxmail.org> wrote:

[#393204] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Eric Christopherson <echristopherson@...> 2012/02/07

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@gmail.com> wrote:

[#393206] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...> 2012/02/07

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Eric Christopherson <

[#393208] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Kevin <darkintent@...> 2012/02/07

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@gmail.com> wrote:

[#393216] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2012/02/07

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Kevin <darkintent@gmail.com> wrote:

[#393219] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...> 2012/02/07

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>wrote:

[#393220] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2012/02/07

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> wrote:

[#393240] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...> 2012/02/08

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>wrote:

[#393254] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2012/02/08

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> wrote:

[#393259] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...> 2012/02/08

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>wrote:

[#393181] Tork 18.0.0 — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...>

Tork - Test with fork - https://github.com/sunaku/tork#readme

16 messages 2012/02/06
[#393183] Re: [ANN] Tork 18.0.0 — Bartosz Dziewoński <matma.rex@...> 2012/02/06

You have faster major version release cycle than Chrome...

[#393189] Re: [ANN] Tork 18.0.0 — Quintus <sutniuq@...> 2012/02/06

Am 06.02.2012 22:07, schrieb Bartosz Dziewoナгki:

[#393203] Re: Tork 18.0.0 — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...> 2012/02/07

Marvin G=C3=BClker wrote in post #1044440:

[#393347] Symbol garbage collection — Dido Sevilla <dido.sevilla@...>

I've always wondered why Ruby didn't do garbage collection of symbols,

13 messages 2012/02/10

[#393402] Who Administrates this list and how can the community help save this list from the noise. — andrew mcelroy <sophrinix@...>

It is very clear that this list has been under a incredibly heavy

21 messages 2012/02/11
[#393403] Re: Who Administrates this list and how can the community help save this list from the noise. — serialhex <serialhex@...> 2012/02/11

+1

[#393407] Re: Who Administrates this list and how can the community help save this list from the noise. — Cathy Alomari <cathy1428@...> 2012/02/11

Good luck, I doubt anyone is paying attention. I have seen numerous

[#393410] Re: Who Administrates this list and how can the community help save this list from the noise. — "Darryl L. Pierce" <mcpierce@...> 2012/02/11

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Cathy Alomari <cathy1428@gmail.com> wrote:

[#393430] Re: Who Administrates this list and how can the community help save this list from the noise. — Cathy Alomari <cathy1428@...> 2012/02/13

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Darryl L. Pierce <mcpierce@gmail.com>wrote:

[#393432] Re: Who Administrates this list and how can the community help save this list from the noise. — Bartosz Dziewoński <matma.rex@...> 2012/02/13

2012/2/13 Cathy Alomari <cathy1428@gmail.com>:

[#393434] Re: Who Administrates this list and how can the community help save this list from the noise. — Rimantas Liubertas <rimantas@...> 2012/02/13

> Have you tried mailing ruby-talk-ctl@ruby-lang.org (mailto:ruby-talk-ctl@ruby-lang.org) with "unsubscribe"

[#393412] the ruby syntax — maven apache <apachemaven0@...>

Hi:

19 messages 2012/02/12
[#393413] Re: the ruby syntax — Bartosz Dziewoński <matma.rex@...> 2012/02/12

When a hash is the last argument to a method, you can skip its open-

[#393416] Re: the ruby syntax — maven apache <apachemaven0@...> 2012/02/12

2012/2/12 Bartosz Dziewo=C5=84ski <matma.rex@gmail.com>

[#393435] Re: the ruby syntax — Saji Hameed <saji@...> 2012/02/13

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:49 PM, maven apache <apachemaven0@gmail.com> wro=

[#393546] Difference between 1.9.2 and 1.9.3 — James French <James.French@...>

module A <- line 1

12 messages 2012/02/20
[#393558] Re: Difference between 1.9.2 and 1.9.3 — Dave Aronson <rubytalk2dave@...> 2012/02/21

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:25, James French

[#393548] Accessing a local variable through a symbol — Ralph Shnelvar <ralphs@...32.com>

Let's say I have

11 messages 2012/02/20

[#393671] Rubymoticons — Dave Aronson <rubytalk2dave@...>

I was demonstrating injection of a symbol, and noticed a familiar

12 messages 2012/02/28

Re: Tork 18.0.0

From: Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
Date: 2012-02-07 09:39:22 UTC
List: ruby-talk #393212
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:11, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 6, 2012, at 21:41 , Nikolai Weibull wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 02:36, Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Marvin G=C3=BClker wrote in post #1044440:
>>>> Am 06.02.2012 22:07, schrieb Bartosz Dziewo=C5=84ski:
>>>>> You have faster major version release cycle than Chrome...
>>
>>>> I was hoping to see version 100.0.0 this year's christmas.
>>
>>> I'm just following RubyGems' Rational Versioning Policy:
>>>
>>> =C2=A0http://docs.rubygems.org/read/chapter/7
>>
>> But perhaps you could rationalize your release cycles.

> Suraj writes open source software and is free to do so in any way he want=
s. If you don't like it or the way he does it then don't use his software. =
But he doesn't have to explain himself to you or anyone else. Personally I =
think the way he writes software makes it less usable, but he says that thi=
s works well for him and that's really all he needs. More power to him.

I don=E2=80=99t understand what you=E2=80=99re getting at.  Do you feel tha=
t I wrote
something untoward?  If so, what?  If you felt the need to defend
Suraj, are you assuming that he cannot do so himself?  And, if you
must write responses such as this, could you please do it in a
pleasant and constructive manner?  Not everyone is looking for a fight
on this mailing list and considering that most of my spare energy is
currently going towards taking care of a displeased baby, I really
don=E2=80=99t have any left over for people like you trying to pick a fight=
.

I commented on this subject because I felt that Suraj is making it
very hard to use his software, as it=E2=80=99s constantly changing and its
thus nearly impossible to gain any of the benefits that come with
updates.  I didn=E2=80=99t feel that I needed to spend too many words
explaining this, as, as you yourself point out, I=E2=80=99m sure he=E2=80=
=99s well
aware of this himself.

But, if need be, I think, Suraj, that you could make it a lot easier
for your users to use your software if you didn=E2=80=99t make, what I woul=
d
consider, minor changes to external interfaces, so easily.  And if you
do, collect more of them between mayor releases so that your users
don=E2=80=99t have to look through a change log every week to get up to spe=
ed
with the latest release.  Please consider this comment as constructive
criticism.

In This Thread