[#393012] Basic Ruby performance — Dmitry Nikiforov <dniq@...>

Hello all!

43 messages 2012/02/02
[#393013] Re: Basic Ruby performance — Dmitry Nikiforov <dniq@...> 2012/02/02

Here's another example with significantly bigger performance difference:

[#393015] Re: Basic Ruby performance — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2012/02/02

[#393016] Re: Basic Ruby performance — Peter Vandenabeele <peter@...> 2012/02/02

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com>wrote:

[#393020] Re: Basic Ruby performance — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2012/02/03

[#393076] Problem migrating to Ruby 1.9.2 — Patrick Bayford <pbayford@...>

Some assistance please - I have a Ruby project, which I started in Ruby

10 messages 2012/02/03

[#393164] Using _ like in Scala? — Marc Heiler <shevegen@...>

fruits = %w( apple banana orange )

27 messages 2012/02/06
[#393201] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...> 2012/02/07

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Marc Heiler <shevegen@linuxmail.org> wrote:

[#393204] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Eric Christopherson <echristopherson@...> 2012/02/07

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@gmail.com> wrote:

[#393206] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...> 2012/02/07

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Eric Christopherson <

[#393208] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Kevin <darkintent@...> 2012/02/07

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@gmail.com> wrote:

[#393216] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2012/02/07

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Kevin <darkintent@gmail.com> wrote:

[#393219] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...> 2012/02/07

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>wrote:

[#393220] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2012/02/07

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> wrote:

[#393240] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...> 2012/02/08

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>wrote:

[#393254] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2012/02/08

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> wrote:

[#393259] Re: Using _ like in Scala? — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...> 2012/02/08

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>wrote:

[#393181] Tork 18.0.0 — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...>

Tork - Test with fork - https://github.com/sunaku/tork#readme

16 messages 2012/02/06
[#393183] Re: [ANN] Tork 18.0.0 — Bartosz Dziewoński <matma.rex@...> 2012/02/06

You have faster major version release cycle than Chrome...

[#393189] Re: [ANN] Tork 18.0.0 — Quintus <sutniuq@...> 2012/02/06

Am 06.02.2012 22:07, schrieb Bartosz Dziewoナгki:

[#393203] Re: Tork 18.0.0 — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...> 2012/02/07

Marvin G=C3=BClker wrote in post #1044440:

[#393347] Symbol garbage collection — Dido Sevilla <dido.sevilla@...>

I've always wondered why Ruby didn't do garbage collection of symbols,

13 messages 2012/02/10

[#393402] Who Administrates this list and how can the community help save this list from the noise. — andrew mcelroy <sophrinix@...>

It is very clear that this list has been under a incredibly heavy

21 messages 2012/02/11
[#393403] Re: Who Administrates this list and how can the community help save this list from the noise. — serialhex <serialhex@...> 2012/02/11

+1

[#393407] Re: Who Administrates this list and how can the community help save this list from the noise. — Cathy Alomari <cathy1428@...> 2012/02/11

Good luck, I doubt anyone is paying attention. I have seen numerous

[#393410] Re: Who Administrates this list and how can the community help save this list from the noise. — "Darryl L. Pierce" <mcpierce@...> 2012/02/11

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Cathy Alomari <cathy1428@gmail.com> wrote:

[#393430] Re: Who Administrates this list and how can the community help save this list from the noise. — Cathy Alomari <cathy1428@...> 2012/02/13

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Darryl L. Pierce <mcpierce@gmail.com>wrote:

[#393432] Re: Who Administrates this list and how can the community help save this list from the noise. — Bartosz Dziewoński <matma.rex@...> 2012/02/13

2012/2/13 Cathy Alomari <cathy1428@gmail.com>:

[#393434] Re: Who Administrates this list and how can the community help save this list from the noise. — Rimantas Liubertas <rimantas@...> 2012/02/13

> Have you tried mailing ruby-talk-ctl@ruby-lang.org (mailto:ruby-talk-ctl@ruby-lang.org) with "unsubscribe"

[#393412] the ruby syntax — maven apache <apachemaven0@...>

Hi:

19 messages 2012/02/12
[#393413] Re: the ruby syntax — Bartosz Dziewoński <matma.rex@...> 2012/02/12

When a hash is the last argument to a method, you can skip its open-

[#393416] Re: the ruby syntax — maven apache <apachemaven0@...> 2012/02/12

2012/2/12 Bartosz Dziewo=C5=84ski <matma.rex@gmail.com>

[#393435] Re: the ruby syntax — Saji Hameed <saji@...> 2012/02/13

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:49 PM, maven apache <apachemaven0@gmail.com> wro=

[#393546] Difference between 1.9.2 and 1.9.3 — James French <James.French@...>

module A <- line 1

12 messages 2012/02/20
[#393558] Re: Difference between 1.9.2 and 1.9.3 — Dave Aronson <rubytalk2dave@...> 2012/02/21

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:25, James French

[#393548] Accessing a local variable through a symbol — Ralph Shnelvar <ralphs@...32.com>

Let's say I have

11 messages 2012/02/20

[#393671] Rubymoticons — Dave Aronson <rubytalk2dave@...>

I was demonstrating injection of a symbol, and noticed a familiar

12 messages 2012/02/28

Re: stack level too deep (SystemStackError)

From: Sigurd <cu9ypd@...>
Date: 2012-02-01 09:56:29 UTC
List: ruby-talk #392942
Ruby have static stack size for thread - it's defined in vm_core.h 

/* each thread has this size stack : 128KB */
#define RUBY_VM_THREAD_STACK_SIZE (128 * 1024)

System settings have no effect on a ruby thread stack size.

On Feb 1, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Alex Rothbard wrote:

> Hello. If I execute the following code:
> 
> ruby -e 'def t(i) p i;t(i+1) end;t 0'
> 
> I get this:
> 
> ...
> 8730
> 8731
> -e:1: stack level too deep (SystemStackError)
> 
> Alright, that seems normal. My ulimit settings are as follows:
> 
> socket buffer size       (bytes, -b) unlimited
> core file size          (blocks, -c) unlimited
> data seg size           (kbytes, -d) 33554432
> file size               (blocks, -f) unlimited
> max locked memory       (kbytes, -l) unlimited
> max memory size         (kbytes, -m) unlimited
> open files                      (-n) 11095
> pipe size            (512 bytes, -p) 1
> stack size              (kbytes, -s) 524288
> cpu time               (seconds, -t) unlimited
> max user processes              (-u) 5547
> virtual memory          (kbytes, -v) unlimited
> swap size               (kbytes, -w) unlimited
> 
> So, in theory if I *reduce* the stack size, the above number should go
> down, right? That's not what happens. I tried reducing the stack size
> from 512MB to 24KB, but I am still able to get 8731 iterations. Does
> anyone know why?
> 
> -- 
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> 


In This Thread

Prev Next