From: ts <decoux@...>
Date: 2002-04-24T23:56:37+09:00
Subject: Re: Numberic#prev

>>>>> "M" == Mike Campbell <michael_s_campbell@yahoo.com> writes:

M> I'm not sure what your point is.  I was merely pointing out that there IS
M> precedent (no pun intended) for having a string successor operation without a
M> corresponding predecessor operation.  The implementation of it wasn't at issue.

 A "precedent" which don't use the same rules is not really a "precedent"
 and not a good reference.


Guy Decoux