From: Mike Campbell <michael_s_campbell@...>
Date: 2002-04-24T23:52:56+09:00
Subject: RE: Numberic#prev

I'm not sure what your point is.  I was merely pointing out that there IS
precedent (no pun intended) for having a string successor operation without a
corresponding predecessor operation.  The implementation of it wasn't at issue.

> >>>>> "M" == Mike Campbell <michael_s_campbell@yahoo.com> writes:
>
> M> $x = "foo";
> M> $x++;  # => "fop"
>
>  Try it with "/" and do the same with ruby