From: Intransition Date: 2011-10-19T12:41:30+09:00 Subject: Re: Help figuring out appropriate naming scheme (previously 'wedge') On Oct 18, 2:13 am, Robert Klemme wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Intransition wrote: > > > On Oct 17, 9:57 pm, "Sean O'Halpin" wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Intransition wrote: > >> > As you can see I've gone round and round with ideas and nothing has > >> > really struck me as the "Ah ha!" right way to go. So I've turned to > >> > the ruby community for any suggestions. Appreciate any guidance others > >> > can give. > > >> I'd go for LoadHook myself. And steer clear of RbConfig. > > > Ah, LoadHook. That is a good name. Might well have used it too, except > > Loadable turned up and it looks like it will work to good result. > > Why not use the gem's name as namespace, e.g. In deed I did, I renamed the gem to 'loadable'. > I also find the name "RubyLoader" too unspecific.  I mean, it's clear > that it's Ruby because that is the language it was written for and in. >  But I get no idea what it really does.  Can you describe what it > really does?  If all else fails BaseLoader or just Base might be a > good choice (after all, you have it namespaced already). My bad, I didn't really explain that. It's called RubyLoader b/c it isolates loading from Ruby's standard library. See section 4.1 of https://github.com/rubyworks/loadable.