From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
Date: 2011-10-18T15:13:40+09:00
Subject: Re: Help figuring out appropriate naming scheme (previously 'wedge')

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Intransition <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 17, 9:57 pm, "Sean O'Halpin" <sean.ohal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Intransition <transf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > As you can see I've gone round and round with ideas and nothing has
>> > really struck me as the "Ah ha!" right way to go. So I've turned to
>> > the ruby community for any suggestions. Appreciate any guidance others
>> > can give.
>>
>> I'd go for LoadHook myself. And steer clear of RbConfig.
>
> Ah, LoadHook. That is a good name. Might well have used it too, except
> Loadable turned up and it looks like it will work to good result.

Why not use the gem's name as namespace, e.g.

module Wedge
end

or

module LoadWedges
end

I also find the name "RubyLoader" too unspecific.  I mean, it's clear
that it's Ruby because that is the language it was written for and in.
 But I get no idea what it really does.  Can you describe what it
really does?  If all else fails BaseLoader or just Base might be a
good choice (after all, you have it namespaced already).

Kind regards

robert

-- 
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/