From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2002-04-24T14:44:56+09:00
Subject: Re: Numberic#prev

Hi,

In message "Numberic#prev"
    on 02/04/24, Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org> writes:

|I do a lot of incrementing and decrementing of values: it'd be nice if
|Numeric#succ had a counter part.
|
|The attached patch provides Numeric#prev which is faster in tight
|loops than (one less object):

I think you meant Integer#prev.

I'm not sure how much useful it is.  And I'm (little bit) afraid of it
might cause request for String#prev, which is way difficult to define.

							matz.