From: Phillip Gawlowski Date: 2011-10-12T04:08:11+09:00 Subject: Re: why does `a + f b` not parse? On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Robert Klemme wrote: > >  I mean "a b" can never by "a.b" but must always be > "a(b)".  That leaves only "2.+(sqrt(5))" on your list (item 2, same as > item 5). What about 2.+(2)? It's equivalent to 2 + 2, after all, and not 2(+(2)). "never" is a strong word to use, especially in Ruby. ;) -- Phillip Gawlowski gplus.to/phgaw | twitter.com/phgaw A method of solution is perfect if we can forsee from the start, and even prove, that following that method we shall attain our aim.               -- Leibniz