From: "Carina C. Zona" Date: 2011-10-06T08:49:13+09:00 Subject: Re: [ANN] ruby-doc.org has been updated Answering my own question: it's a standard library, not core. It'd be nice if the site could offer the core page's list/filter feature for (core+stdlib). The people most in need of documentation are least likely to know which stuff to lookup on the core section of the site vs stdlib section. "Not found" will translate to "ruby doesn't have that" or "go find a gem" in many a newcomer's mind. On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Carina C. Zona wrote: > Hmm.  Why isn't Etc listed among the Class/Module selector?  It's part > of core for 1.9.x, right? > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:38 PM, James Britt wrote: >> Carina C. Zona wrote: >>> >>> The new styling is a nice.  And no more frames, definite upgrade! >> >> You'd might be surprised that some people miss them. (I don't.) >> >>> >>> Adding class/method search was a much-needed feature.  Thank you. >>> Issues on the http://ruby-doc.org/core/ page: >>> >>> 1) Methods filter is failing on searches for any of the methods equal >>> to or starting with "<" or ">". >> >> Ah. :( >> >> I'll have to see what's up with that. >>> >>> 2) Although the method filter is snappy on the first search, it then >>> needs 30-90 seconds to do anything else, even update from a single >>> character backspace or permit the browser to do page reload.  (On my >>> Chrome/OSX, anyway.  Anyone else seeing experiencing this?).  The >>> class/module filter does not share this issue. >> >> >> Work is being done on this.  It is slow, especially on Chrome. >> >> >> Thanks for the feedback. >> >> >> James >> >> >> > > > > -- >   Carina > > --   Carina