From: Isaac Sanders Date: 2011-10-06T00:06:43+09:00 Subject: Re: ERB or Haml? --20cf303f649613be7204ae8e8ee0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable :D 2011/10/5 Bartosz Dziewo=C5=84ski > How about Markaby? It's a bit like Haml and I, for one, like > understanding what will happen without learning quirks of yet another > syntax. > > 2011/10/5, Nation, Carey : > > No experience with erb (or haml in ruby, either), but I've used scalatr= a > > (Sinatra for scala) and it uses a flavor of haml (scaml). Man, that > > sentence looks like lisp. Anyway, I really like haml. It is very > > terse, very light. I like that the understand that the world is made o= f > > div's and make it very clean to declare them. For all that I know, ERB > > might do the same. > > > > Anyway, of all of the frameworks and such that I've used/played with, I > > like this best... > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Josh Cheek [mailto:josh.cheek@gmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 7:56 PM > > To: ruby-talk ML > > Subject: Re: ERB or Haml? > > > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Isaac Sanders > > wrote: > > > >> ERB or Haml? > >> > >> Vote here: http://t.co/5ju0pssY > >> > > > > Depends, I use both on my site. > > > > Also, ERB has an advantage of being embeddable everywhere, whereas Haml > > only renders HTML. > > > > > > > -- > -- Matma Rex > > --=20 Sincerely, Isaac Sanders Section C-4B Vice Chief, Order of the Arrow Vice Chief of Administration, Tecumseh #65 Eagle Scout --20cf303f649613be7204ae8e8ee0--